Tuesday, December 21, 2010

Sheriff Grady Judd Takes on the First Amendment



The recent arrest of Phillip Greaves by Florida authorities has constitutional advocates asking The Question.

Is free speech free?

CNN legal analyst Jeffrey Toobin regarding Greaves controversial book:

"It's repulsive and awful. But I don't think they can go forward because the book is clearly protected by the First Amendment," Toobin said. "This book, as awful as it is, it is only words."

Words on a page or over a computer screen gets a person arrested here in Florida. A conviction can result in sex offender registration.

(...)

Toobin pointed to a similar case that went to the Supreme Court in 2002 where cartoons depicting children in acts similar to ones in Greaves' book were deemed protected by the Constitution.

"Certainly the sheriff and I disagree about the constitutional issue, but I agree with him that the issue of child pornography is a very serious one and I'm certainly glad that law enforcement is taking an active stand against it," Toobin said.


Arresting officer Polk County Sheriff Grady Judd rebutted Toobin with the rationale behind the arrest.

(...)

"This has nothing to do with free speech and everything to do with obscenity," said Judd. "We had a law in Florida that applied. We only needed jurisdiction."

Judd said his detectives were able to establish jurisdiction by conducting an undercover operation and purchasing and receiving a copy of the book through the mail.

"He mailed this book to us. It was a how-to book of how to sexually abuse children," Judd said. "It clearly violated Florida law. "There's too much hand-wringing across the nation. When we can't stand together as a nation and say you can't write a book with real stories of children being sexually abused, then it's time to change the law."


The "mailed book" is the "opening of the door"method sting operations have utilized for years to obtain arrest warrants. Judd justified the Greaves arrest by citing "...a Florida obscenity law that says that it is illegal to portray children in an explicit sexual manner."

Ironically, the sheriff may have unwittingly opened his own door to inspection of best practices used by law enforcement.

With the high profile coverage this case will certainly receive by the press, the spotlight on police sting tactics and what some refer to as entrapment will likely prove intensive.

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

The defendant has already stated that he is going to fight this as an entrapment case. I wonder how far he will get on this.

A couple of questions that need to be asked is, were their depictions or pictures in the book of children being molested? How certain is LO that the verbal descriptions are actually committed offenses? Why hasn't Fla law enforcement gone after other sites that depict child sexual abuse from the internet (several henti comics come to mind)?

I think that in this age, Fla is going to have a long row to hoe in getting a solid conviction of this man. There is no evidence to state that he committed an offense, and the SC has already stated that while some are offended by some writings, that it is protected.

Anonymous said...

My understanding is that no pictures or illustrations were included in this book.

All words.

In the above interview, "Toobin pointed to a similar case that went to the Supreme Court in 2002 in which cartoons depicting children in acts similar to ones in Greaves' book were deemed protected by the Constitution."

So, will be interesting to see how this all plays out.

Vox Populi said...

Grady is making an ass of himself as usual. notice his firm connection to RELIGION.

Also, look: the pot boils a bit higher:
For some reason Janet has been all over the place lately ...
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20101226/bs_afp/usattackssecurity
Now we're going to get tighter at MALLS and HOTELS.
Everyone, STAY HOME !!! We only want people here who don't mind being fondled.

Back to you, Grady.