e (and others) feel the recent amendments added to congressional proposals discussed here are nothing but "poison pills", additions inserted to defeat the bill (or at the very least, slow down the process) much like the GOP did with health care.
Not about RSO's at all.
Misuse of the registry? Or freakin' dirty politic, per usual?
Additionally, sometimes these poison pills do become some form of the passed legislation, as was noted a few years back with home weatherization funding, where the county added criteria disallowing registered sex offenders from the granting and receipt of these federal dollars.
Also disturbing--somewhere along the line, an individual actually brainstormed these exclusions, poison pill or not.
Sick.
5 comments:
Here's my issue with these. Obviously lawmakers think themselves bullet-proof when they make these additions to bills, either that or they WANT the press to get them in the spotlight as being 'tough on ex-criminals who've paid their debt to society, and only want to try and have normalacy'.. But I digress...
i know that courts are not kind to us, even when the law IS on our side, courts have historically bent it so to exclude us as well. I can;t believe I am saying this, but it almost seems that the governments (state, fed, local) want to piss us off enough to be as ignorant as to believe we should pick up arms against them. on a tangent, maybe that is their ultimate goal in all this; Solve the rso problem by slaughtering us all for 'the sake of gawd fearin, public law obeyin' people'.. No idea.
I for one will not be picking up arms to rise against the nation, but the language used, and the intentions of a great many public officials is frightening, because there are many thousands of rso's that are mentally incapable of handling such situations, and thus might be that level of foolish one day. I hope I am dead by then, atleast to spare my family the horror and indignation of a government sweep to put us into their final solution..the camps.
well, that's written RIGHT IN the constitution. Read it if you haven't. Overthrow of the government. It's not a sin to mention that. In fact, it was encouraged by our Founding Fathers. Overthrow doesn't have to be violent.
Stopping this is as easy as passing a NEW law. Making the old one obsolete. It's just that easy.
Then they can be dead and gone and save their family the embarrassment.
It only takes one person to write a law, collect signatures get it on the ballot... let THAT sweep the country. This is an outragesou state for a free country to be in. Malevolent outside forces and the masonic body .. turning the people against themselves. It's how they WIN. But we don't have to LET them.
Judges have made entire careers as attorneys aspiring to be judges riding the sex offender rules and protectin the chirrun into the black robe. Those inside the legal field KNOW this.
well, that's written RIGHT IN the constitution. Read it if you haven't. Overthrow of the government. It's not a sin to mention that. In fact, it was encouraged by our Founding Fathers. Overthrow doesn't have to be violent.
Our founding fathers were a very different breed of person than what is in Washington currently. The major difference is, most of the founding fathers were NOT career politicians, had no aspiration to be career politicians, and frankly most did not want to be there in the capacity they were in. George Washington only wanted to return to Virgina after the war and retire to a quiet life, if that gives you any idea.
Our present government wants to be there, they enjoy living off OUR money, and they don;t take too kindly to people that want to see them gone. Hence things like the Committee on UnAmerican Activities, Patriot Act, Title 18, Pt. 1, Ch 115, Code 2385. Our Founding Fathers might have been 'radicals', but our present government wants to make sure they keep all that powr to themselves.
True they are corrupt sloughers at the trough. You called that correctly. BUT only because we are allowing it. Whether that be by allowing corrupt voting practices or just plain allowing some fascist to remain in office. Then what it takes is people MORE LIKE the founding fathers who say: YOU get the F out of here.... and then, like George W, retire quietly back to our farms. I'm afraid that once one cares enough to say STOP THIS and I'M NOT GOING TO TAKE IT ANYMORE ... the right to retire is gone for most of the time. It's time for people who care that much to take back over. I think we see some of that and we also see the faux idiots who foam at the mouth (sarah palin) as soon as they see a microphone and hore out their children to keep their name in the news. Man, Abraham Lincoln managed to get elected by Word of Mouth. You guys better get to borders. These f'ers are putting out some scary books with instructions on how to 'take back' their country. They get all the good ideas from us but then skank them up as only a carney is truly capable of doing. The people who care have to step up to the plate or like it or not all that TJ and GW and AL and the others did was a waste of time. I'm sick of the whole war-chest mentality. IT's a bunch of BULLSHIT that someone needs millions of dollars to win a race. Whatever. They're just thieves.
Back to the topic of the post though:
The registry is for "public safety" and is "remedial not punitive". However adding RSO's to las as a measure to stop them from receiving aid IS punitive, and could be seen as double jeopardy. There is nothing safety related in stopping an RSO from getting unemployment, nor FHA loans.
Post a Comment