
As a mother of two, I hoped Caylee Anthony would be found alive.
As an activist, I also knew such a finding could reenergize lawmakers to bleat an I told ya so in defense of child safety laws that have unfairly stigmatized many Americans and their families.
That could still happen, depending on just when the plastic bag containing the youngster's remains was placed (buried?) on the wooded site.
That's a stretch, but either way, questions remain.
Who killed Caylee?
Who put that child in a plastic bag and dumped her like a piece of trash?
If the killer is a family member which lawmaker will step forward first to file "Caylee's Law", some sort of proposal aimed at regular everyday parents and their extended families, grandma, grandpa, etc. etc. etc.
And will the media finally report the truth behind child safety?
That kids are more likely to be killed or kidnapped by their own family members than persons unknown to them? Read the research here.
That child predation is what many have known all along--the worst sort of Fear Card that can be dealt to parents?
How close are we to the ultimate invasion regarding the privacy rights of our children, i.e. the insertion of a GPS microchip to "protect our kids", to proactively address the possibility that a child could go missing? Your child could go missing. A chip could help us find your child.
Because that sort of thinking is the cornerstone on which lawmakers have built the sex offender laws and law enforcement uses to explain away their online sting operations.
It could happen to you thinking.
Now, America's families. It could happen to you.
I envision some sort of minimum time to report a child missing law. Consequence for noncompliance? Third degree felony. One year and a day. Registration as a Child Offender,
a label that really lands a brand on a parent as "neglectful".
The old do you know where your children are logic?
Wouldn't matter if the kid turns up at a neighbor's house. Who knows if the next time the child remains unreported, he or she is found in a garbage bag in the woods.
Governmental thinking:
It could happen, so we are making certain right from the get-go, it doesn't.
Oh, and somehow, the state will profit off the new parental negligence law.
Remember what I have said all along. First, lawmakers start stripping away the rights of those without power through sensationalizing a horrific crime, behaviorally chaining ultimate disgust and distaste to a law that the rest of us immediately buy into, such as the Jessica Lunsford Act.
These horrible people deserved this. And the streets are crawling with them.
Bingo. A straight up my child is safe now because the law protects us fetish is formed.
Once we allow those in power to get away with such psychological damaging unconstitutional lawmaking, it's a slippery slope to us.
In fact, I wouldn't be surprised if Caylee's grandparents start lobbying for "Caylee's Law" themselves. We should have reported her missing earlier. Support our law so other grandchildren don't suffer the same horrible death.
Although our President-elect is a constitutional attorney, we Frogs still live in Florida where the hang 'em high mentality is alive and well.
Although part of me almost hopes I'm right--that such a law is pitched and passed--having lived without privacy as a citizen who has committed no crime (which doesn't appear to matter to the state) yet stands in support of a loved one fallen victim to Fetish Lawmaking...well, I wouldn't wish such a nightmare on anyone.
In closing--
Protect your privacy rights. Protect your family.
Don't. Be. Fooled.
13 comments:
Does anyone know if Nancy Grace has been arrested yet for the Anthony case? Or do they have to wait until a weekday after the courts open back up? Maybe they will have to wait until the first of next year since most offices are closed already through the holidays and will open back up after the first of next year. Hope Nancy Grace doesn't harm anyone else in the meantime.
Ahhhhh, Nancy showed several pictures of the twins when she had a supervised-visitation with them. Sweet, pictures of Nancy with her grandkids.............. precious!
So, Has Nancy Grace been arrested yet for setting up the find of little Caylee?
Sunny, it scares me to think that at this point in time after the extensibly documented deceptions of the Bush administration, that Americans would have any sense of trust in our government. Americans are too absorbed in their own lives to seriously consider the influence of the government on their lives. Their first come to mind thought must be right and as long as it falls in line with consensus as they think they know it is accepted as fact and ends any further discerning thought. Meanwhile our government herds us into a corner of their choosing.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SbX4OA2Kkss
Here is a video clip made of and about caylee. It has got to be one of the best ones I have ever seen. Gonna bet it might make you cry.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8PeAjAYDRDU&feature=related
KAK!
Love the world's prayer on your site....No more Cheney! No more Bush! Beautiful.
You are definitely right on about the herd mentality, especially those who feel the law will never touch them.
Until it does.
Then, it's like...it's not supposed to work like this in the USA.
We can only hope to turn around the damage done by the Bush years.
The you tubes were sad. :(
So, here we have the REAL threat to kids.
That whole family is so messed up. Don't tell me that child was killed or died so close to the grand's house and they didn't know anything about it...
A voice of reason.
I think folks effected by this should start filing lawsuits even if they have to do it pro se and send copies to richard taylor in WA and to this gentleman. There's also a guy at stetson (one, isn't that incredibly sad?? but i'm sure there are more) who has spoken up about civil liberties.
Your civil liberties are effected FOR NO REASON.
This is a very powerful post, sunny.
I really wanted to be sure you read that article. So, hopefully I'll be back to comment on the actual post.
yeah, the whole deal is f'd up. It really is.
My mom would have beaten ME to death to find my children if they were missing.
I would not have had any peace if she had not known where her baby was.
That's a GRANDMA. This woman is not a grandma. I came first with my mom right up until I had my child. That's that. So, all the way around it's suspicious
Hey Vox...
Thanks for linking to
Safety and fear make up Adam Walsh's legacy.
I especially enjoyed the comments. A few years back, all would've been in favor of Walsh's actions. But now, as civil liberties are stripped from more and more people, the awareness and education (and disbelief) is heightened, causing people to question their lawmakers regarding the necessity and rigidity of offender laws.
John's comment said it all.
"I am happy the Walsh family finally has the answer. But, much of my previous fear & loathing of "Sex Offenders" had been based on the Adam Walsh Act & now the person who brutally murdered Adam was not a Sex Offender at all. On recent new shows, they've shown that we now list children who had consensual sex or who urinated in public on Sex Offender Registries; this is a life sentence which stigmatizes not only them, but their families & precludes any possibility of a normal existence. I am beginning to feel poor Adam's name has been used to manipulate society in order to gain political favor by instilling fear & paranoia where it may not be needed. Even if the killer of Adam had been previously prosecuted he would not have been listed on any public forum & if he had been listed on today?s Please explain how the public is supposed to evaluate who is a true threat to society when this is our current law?"
John, 3% of those listed on the sex offender registries are considered truly dangerous. The thing is, people like John Walsh want to keep you afraid. A fearful society is way easier to control.
Comments on this articleby voxy Dec 23, 2008 4:53 PM
dear god, please don't let me ever run across anyone clueless enough to admit they are LEO and make the below comment. Thank you, Mr. Moran. Thank you John, Kay and others.
by Sunny Dec 23, 2008 4:53 PM
Good question, John. Here's the answer. 3% of those listed on the sex offender registries are considered truly dangerous. The thing is, people like John Walsh want to keep you afraid. A fearful society is way easier to control. Demand the truth.
by John Dec 22, 2008 1:38 PM
I am happy the Walsh family finally has the answer. But, much of my previous fear & loathing of ?Sex Offenders? had been based on the Adam Walsh Act & now the person who brutally murdered Adam was not a Sex Offender at all. On recent new shows, they?ve shown that we now list children who had consensual sex or who urinated in public on Sex Offender Registries; this is a life sentence which stigmatizes not only them, but their families & precludes any possibility of a normal existence. I am beginning to feel poor Adams name has been used to manipulate society in order to gain political favor by instilling fear & paranoia where it may not be needed. Even if the killer of Adam had been previously prosecuted he would not have been listed on any public forum & if he had been listed on today?s Please explain how the public is supposed to evaluate who is a true threat to society when this is our current law?
by Pepe Dec 22, 2008 12:18 PM
NOW we put the faces of none violent 14 year old children in public sex offenders list - destroying their lives and their families lives for ever. The law is called Adam Walsh. In the old days, these families would've been helped, not destroyed.
The tide is turning....:)
Post a Comment